November 4th Voters Guide

Early Voting: October 20 - Friday, October 31
Election Day: November 4 2025

Our chapter has not endorsed any propositions or state amendments this cycle.

Candidates must seek the endorsement of San Antonio DSA (SADSA), and our membership votes on the decision to endorse. All positions in this guide are named for informational purposes only. This guide is by no means exhaustive and does not cover every race in our area, but we hope this can help inform your decisions.

Elections are but one arena where we can deliver material change for the working class, making it a key site of struggle. To that end, we invite you to become a DSA member and join us in organizing for a better San Antonio beyond the ballot box. All across the country, DSA is fighting for a stronger labor movement, affordable housing, trans and immigrant rights, a free Palestine, and more. A better world is possible, but not guaranteed. Join or recommit to DSA today to build working class power —together! Thank you for reading our voter guide! We have a world to win.

DSAUSA.Org/Join

In Bexar County you can vote at any voting location. Find voting locations, hours, your individual sample ballot and more at the Bexar Co. Elections Department website

If you have any questions or comments, please do not email us at SanAntonioDSA@gmail.com.

Bexar County

Proposition A: Against

Rationale: 

Our members have attended numerous Town Halls, and you almost get a little sad for the San Antonio Stock and Rodeo Show. Hour after hour goes by and no one cares about Proposition A. It would be coherent to step into the voting booth and vote against both propositions. After all, many of the same arguments against the Spurs Arena also apply to Proposition A, but at least there’s not a wealth of research against public investments in Rodeos here. Regardless of public support for this particular proposition, the Rodeo’s expansion relies on the Spurs leaving their Paradise of Parking at the Frost Bank Center for greener pastures. It’s extremely possible that Proposition A will marginally pass while Proposition B marginally fails. This would be the funniest of all possible outcomes.

Proposition B: Against

Rationale: 

There has been no shortage of thoughtful, dismissive, or belligerent musings about Proposition B. Some argue (and we agree!) that directly-publicly funded stadiums are bad public investments, that the Spurs lied and abandoned development promises on the Eastside, that the Holts profit off the deaths of Palestinian children, that the Council and Commissioners Court put the deal together in secrecy, that we’ve already built two arenas which failed to deliver on their promises, and that the “For” campaign has fallen back on the always reliable argument: the Spurs will leave. There are also those who simply don't like sports or the Spurs. These constituencies may make up over 50% of the electorate. Recent polling showed only 14% undecided. If you agree with any of the reasons above, we recommend you vote against Proposition B. However, if you're still undecided and, like us, deeply love sports, we present, below, the NBA Lover’s rationale for voting Against. GSG!

-

During what has otherwise been a sleepy NBA offseason, San Antonians have been doing their best First Take impressions for and against Proposition B. Unfortunately, it has led to little reflection into the current landscape of the Spurs as a Business but more enshrinement of the Spurs as Culture. In September, Pablo Torre (allegedly) found out Steve Ballmer of the Clippers circumvented the salary cap by luring Kawhi Leonard to plant a tree. Kawhi is no stranger to Spurs fans, and while it’s easy to chalk the whole debacle up to yet another Uncle Dennis fumble, it should serve as a stark reminder that NBA owners and their investors are often remarkably dumb and don’t care about you. Further, there has been little action from Adam Silver, the NBA, or other team owners to do anything other than dismiss the actions of one rogue owner. This can only lead us to believe many owners are also circumventing the salary cap. Truly, the "enshittification" of everything for profit has ushered in the Era of Owners Who Hate (Most of) Their Fans™. From Nelson Wolff Stadium, to the Alamodome, to the Frost Bank Center, when Team Owners are ready to move on, we’re charged with keeping the lights on. 

As fans, we’ve seen the NBA deteriorate since the heyday of the '90s and '00s, all for the sake of owners and investors grifting social and monetary capital. TV deals and media rights have intentionally made it impossible to watch games at home and, unintentionally, made Stream.East a household name. Ticket prices have slowly crept up due to algorithms and excessive “service fees,” and if you actually make it to a game, you’re left paying markup for the same Pizza Hut and Gordon Food Service chicken tenders you get outside the arena. Plenty of excuses have been made for these factors. Unfortunately for proponents of Prop B, politics is the practice of addition. For the past decade, owners and investors have been profit-seeking off “whales,” aka fans who will spend 100x more than the everyday fan just to sit courtside for a night. The Spurs organization has directly blamed the lack of whale experiences as part of the rationale for a new stadium. It follows that city councilmembers and commissioners, who regularly get free seats from lobbyists and corporations, see themselves as beneficiaries. It’s easier to buy off 6 Councilmembers than it is a whole electorate. The rest of us may not be whales, but we still get a vote.

The failure of publicly funded stadiums to generate economic growth is such an established truth that only a few academics still study the topic. Forty years of research show little to no economic growth from publicly funded stadiums, making them a poor use of public investment dollars. For this reason, it makes sense that the Spurs and their campaign have focused on telling you not to worry it’s such a poor investment – it’s not even taxpayer money! It’s certainly not Peter J Holt’s money, who we assume has spent much of his life in a race car bed. Instead, Peter profits off US government contracts in Israel and acts as a used car salesman for farm equipment. But the problem with a third publicly funded stadium is that eventually, you run out of everyone else’s money. 

This leaves many working-class San Antonians asking, "What's in it for us?" Former mayors, chambers of commerce, and real estate moguls want you to believe that San Antonio’s economy will crumble, that this 300-year-old city will be reduced to rubble as the Holts drive their genocidal caterpillars out of town. They say the Spurs could leave for the thriving tech hub of Seattle, pointing to the SuperSonics as a cautionary tale. They claim that all $1.3 billion will be paid for by visitors, but we mustn’t let Abbott get our tax dollars. Sorry, we must have missed Peter J. Holt’s speech at No Kings this weekend.

Regardless of how the vote goes, this is only the beginning. If the propositions fail, we move on to years of negotiations to sketch out a binding deal. Streets will still be under construction, our favorite bars and restaurants will be closed by landlords raising their rents, public schools in SAISD will continue to crumble, and that guy from high school will still be asking, "Will this pay for more police?" As coalition members of the Schools Our Students Deserve we will continue to push for a community benefits agreement that centers our majority black and brown working class, calls for more than the originally agreed to non-binding $75 Million, and fight for living wages for workers that will inevitably run the stadium if it is built downtown. 

Sports have always served as entertainment for the masses, a salve for the brutality and monotony of daily life. As such, they've always had a tinge of politics. Why shouldn’t politics have a tinge of sports?

¹UT San Antonio CPOR Poll

²Public funding for sports stadiums: Research Roundup

State of Texas

There are 17 statewide propositions on the November 4 ballot. If you’re thinking “woah, that’s a lot” you’d be correct! Statewide propositions are items passed by the legislature , which need voter approval because they amend the Texas Constitution.

There are a handful of propositions that affect taxes on the ballot. In Texas we have done a really good job at creating a tax system that is only good for rich people. We have also pigeon holed ourselves into relying heavily on property taxes or sales taxes. What we really need is a state income tax but we banned that in a statewide election a few years ago and Conservatives want to ban more types of progressive taxes that we don’t even have (See props 2, 6, and 8).

It is important to note that the state does not collect property taxes. Property tax rates are set by local governments (cities, counties, school districts, special districts). Typically, the largest portion of a property tax bill comes from the school district. Any property tax cut will affect school districts. If you’re a working class person, you’re probably also struggling to keep up with property taxes. Unfortunately, this creates a cycle that starves the collective public of much needed benefits and saves the wealthy much more in property taxes than it saves you. 

The state is picking up the tab for the property tax measures on this ballot, however, we will eventually be in a state budget deficit and school district funding will almost certainly be cut when that happens. Large property tax cuts similar to the ones currently proposed are unsustainable. Our legislators need to start thinking seriously about that and ask themselves if they trust their republican colleagues to go to bat for our public schools, medicaid, state parks, higher education, state employee benefits, and other important state funded programs.

  • Prop 1 would create an endowment for Texas State Technical College

    Rationale: 

    Texas State Technical College (TSTC) trains people for high need jobs at their 11 campuses across the state. They currently do not have a dedicated source of funding meaning that their funding is up to the whims of the legislature. Meaning they’re underfunded. They are in desperate need of new facilities and renovations. Please vote yes so TSTC can fix their leaking roofs.

  • Prop 2 would ban the state from taxing capital gains of an individual, family, estate or trust

    Rationale: 

    This proposition bans a tax for rich people that we don’t even have. It is a complete waste of time. Capital gains tax only affects the top 1-2% of tax payers and would actually be a good thing to have. This restricts Texas’ ability to impose new taxes which is going to be bad when we are in a budget deficit and have no options.

  • Prop 3 would require judges to deny bail in specific felony offenses

    Rationale:

    The Democrats flipped Harris County about 10 years ago and ever since then the R’s have been throwing a hissy fit. The R’s are sore losers and have decided to scream loudly over Harris County bail reform efforts. This proposition is really bad. It is one of the few things the Democrats had been able to stop for the last few legislative sessions. This proposition denies bail to those ACCUSED of certain felonies. These are pretrial cases and defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. This proposition flips that on its head. It sets a terrible precedent and with over policing and so many criminal laws on the books, this will allow the state to disappear more people. This will lead to more people in our jails which are already overcrowded and unable to meet the basic human needs of those forced to be in them.

  • Prop 4 would allocate a portion of sales tax revenue to the Texas water fund

    Rationale:

    This proposition rocks! It would allow $20 billion to be used for water infrastructure projects over the next 2 decades. The money would go to fixing aging pipes and other infrastructure; developing and increasing new water sources, such as desalination; flood mitigation projects; and supporting conservation efforts to help meet water demands. The only thing that would make this better is if there were MORE money. We should have done this 20 years ago but better late than never. Our state is literally running out of water and many areas across Texas are feeling the effects of the state's neglect. If we don’t pass this we will all feel it very soon. 

  • Prop 5 would provide additional tax exemption of animal feed

    Rationale:

    We would love it if the state would do something significant to help struggling ranchers and farmers, but this isn’t it. This is a tax cut for agricultural retail stores. Livestock feed is already exempt from state sales tax and is generally untaxed throughout its production and consumption. There is no guarantee that the savings will reach consumers. Sorry, best we could do is bail out Argentina. 

  • Prop 6 would prohibit the state from creating new taxes on stock trading

    Rationale:

    This is another proposition that bans a tax for rich people that we don’t even have. Texas now has its own Stock Exchange (how insufferable) and people will tell you that this prop is to support the creation of it. But we know it’s to make sure rich people don’t have to pay taxes on the buying and selling of stocks, bonds, etc. This restricts Texas’ ability to impose new taxes which is going to be bad when we are in a budget deficit and have no options.

  • Prop 7 would provide a property tax exemption to the spouses of veterans whose death was service-connected

    Rationale:

    This closes a gap concerning federal law under the PACT Act, which recognizes service members affected by toxic exposure as 100% disabled. The PACT Act allows a property tax exemption to veterans or their spouses, but those who died before the PACT Act passed are not eligible. This closes that gap. Our country does a really bad job at supporting those who fall victim to the military and their families, and we should do better. This would cost the state almost nothing. It wouldn’t affect very many people, but it would mean a lot to those who qualify.

  • Prop 8 would prohibit the state from ever imposing death taxes

    Rationale:

    This is another proposition that bans a tax for rich people that we don’t even have. An inheritance tax is often referred to as a “death tax”. These taxes are paid by the person receiving inheritance. This also affects estate taxes which are deducted from the deceased's estate before they are given the person receiving them. Only wealthy people pay these taxes. This restricts Texas’ ability to impose new taxes which is going to be bad when we are in a budget deficit and have no options.

  • Prop 9 would increase tax exemption for businesses from $2,500 to $125,000

    Rationale:

    This is a property tax exemption increase for businesses. This would raise the local Business Personal Property (BPP) tax exemption from $2,500 to $125,000 and extend eligibility to businesses of any size. This shifts the tax burden away from businesses and onto residents.

  • Prop 10 would provide a temporary tax exemption to homes completely destroyed by a fire

    Rationale:

    This is a good proposition and helps Texans whose homes burn down. It isn’t only for those impacted by the wildfires, but it will help them. It creates a process to temporarily lower property taxes on homes destroyed by fire.

  • Prop 11 would increase the amount of tax exemption for people who are elderly or disabled

    Rationale:

    This proposition pairs with Prop 13. It gives the elderly or disabled an extra homestead exemption of $60,000. This means that if Prop 11 and Prop 13 pass the elderly and disabled would get a homestead exemption of $200,000. That is significant and could keep some people in their homes.

  • Prop 12 would increase the number of governor appointed members to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct (SCJC)

    Rationale:

    The State Commission on Judicial Conduct (SCJC) is an independent agency responsible for investigating allegations of judicial misconduct and disability. This proposition does a lot, but all you need to know is that this is an effort by R’s to erode judicial independence. This threatens the SCJC’s credibility, the separation of powers, and the impartiality of the courts.

  • Prop 13 would increase the property tax homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000

    Rationale:

    This would increase the property tax homestead exemption to $140,000. A home owner with a home valued at $302,000 last year, would have saved about $490 on their school property taxes had this been in place. The price tag on this proposition is large… $2.7 billion. But the state is picking up the tab.

  • Prop 14 would establish the Dementia Prevention and Research Institute of Texas and allocate $3 billion to the Dementia Prevention and Research Fund

    Rationale:

    This was a Dan Patrick passion project, but before he thought it was cool it was spearheaded by a long time democratic legislator, Rep. Senfronia Thompson. This would give $3 billion to create the Dementia Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (DPRIT) to study dementia, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and other brain related conditions. We LOVE public health funding and we want more of it.

  • Prop 15 would “[affirm] that parents are the primary decision makers for their children”

    Rationale:

    This is right wing non-sense and a complete waste of time. This is already outlined in federal case law. This comes from the same people that bring us brilliant ideas such as school vouchers and thinking that public schools are turning their kids queer.

  • Prop 16 would “clarify that a voter must be a United States Citizen”

    Rationale:

    This is another proposition that is a complete waste of time. Non-citizens already can’t vote. The one thing this would do is stop cities and counties from allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections. But there have been no real efforts to do that anywhere in Texas. This is a ridiculous proposition that only further villainizes non-citizens.

  • Prop 17 would provide property tax exemption to those who have “border security infrastructure”

    Rationale:

    If you love Operation Lone Star this is the proposition for you. This gives a property tax exemption for those who have “border security” infrastructure built on their private property. Most property along the border is privately owned. We should not incentivize border walls or other types of border barriers to be built.